Is addressomg this simply a matter of displaying the yoomoot FAQ or the seven sins of online collaboration more prominently or do we need to rethink the way we present Yoomoot more fundamentally?
I'm thinking that 'organized discussion' and 'organized collaboration' are too broad and nebulous. We need to get more concrete. Google Wave sold itself as email 2.0, so maybe Yoomoot is forums 2.0. It's true that Yoomoot is more than a forum and that it improves much more than forums (it improves wikis, blogging and Q&A) but it solves forums' problems more clearly than it does other tools', and in order to explain Yoomoot coherently, we have to initially focus on something simple and easily graspable, and explain the bigger picture later.
I would present Yoomoot as forums 2.0 in the following way:
This is very similar to the way of presenting Yoomoot in a brief introduction to Yoomoot
but I think it has the following advantages:
We should use the homepage text to immediately explain Yoomoot's value proposition to newcomers. We need to be aware that at the moment, people are coming to Yoomoot and thinking "Okay what's this all about? Why should I care?". I don't think the current text answers that.
Most people don't click on "more info" so we need to make better use of the homepage text to get the Yoomoot message across.
Clarifying notes to Rocky in response to a revision request: This answer does answer the qustions, it just answers the question vaguely. This was deliberate. There are many different ways in which the homepage text could be changed. It makes sense to first agree that the homepage text should be changed, then decide separately exactly how it should be changed. People might agree that the homepage text needs replacing, but disagree on my proposal for replacement text. Therefore I have addressed that issue in a separate follow-up question.
This term captures Yoomoot's two key value propositions – it makes very long discussions manageable and it makes genuinely many-to-many conversations possible. The term makes it clearer what Yoomoot.com is trying to do more than 'organized collaboration' (which is more suitable for Yoomootpro).
if we call it forum 2.0 - people might expect to see wiki-forum (so ability to edit each other posts) - but that, only one thing what Yoomoot is all about: organisation, quality content, no repetition.
Talking on Yoomoot is different than talking anywhere else - Yoomoot is a new way of talking by using the goods of existing communication solutions.
You can say that Google wave is email 2.0 - because of the way it looks like - it is actually gmail with ability to communicate real-time and more visual threads - it doesn't change the way you communicate.
Not very catchy, but I think it explains Yoomoot.com's (not Yoomootpro's) value proposition better than 'organized collaboration' or 'organized discussion'.